Benar-DynaMap.jpg

DYNAMAP

(Dynamical Brain Mapping Group)


The general objective of the Dynamap team is to develop signal processing strategies for characterizing the spatio-temporal dynamics of brain networks, for both physiological and pathological activity.

With this in view, the first strategy of the team is to combine the strength of different modalities such as EEG, MEG, fMRI, with particular emphasis on simultaneous recordings (EEG-MEG, EEG-fMRI) that allow recording the exact same activity under different points of view. The second strategy is to take the opportunity of intracerebral recordings performed in patients with epilepsy for providing a ‘ground truth’ to which non-invasive methods can be confronted.

In basic neuroscience, one application of our work is to provide methodological advances for the users of the MEG platform. In clinics, our tools are intended to improve delineation of the epileptogenic zone for presurgical planning of patients with epilepsy. A particular effort is made towards translation of our work to clinicians and researchers through the multi-platform Anywave software, which architecture specifically aims at allowing fast implementation of algorithms to the end users.

 

DYNAMAP TEAM

TEAM LEAD

Christian BÉNAR

DR, INSERM

EMAIL: christian.benar@univ-amu.fr
PHONE: +33 4 91 38 55 62

 

I graduated from Ecole Supérieur d'Electricité (Supélec) in 1994. I then spent one year as an engineer at the Hospital Saint-Anne in Toulon (with Franck Vidal), and two years as a programmer at Stellate Systems (Montréal). I did my PhD under the supervision of Jean Gotman at the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI). Back to France in 2004, my postdocs were in Marseille (fMRI Center, with Jean-Luc Anton) and in Sophia Antipolis (Maureen Clerc and Theodore Papadopoulo). 
I was appointed researcher INSERM in 2006. Since january 2012, I am the leader of the "Dynamical Brain Mapping Group” here at INS. Since September 2014, I am scientific head of the Marseille MEG platform. 
My research interest is signal processing applied to brain signals (fMRI, EEG, MEG), in order to characterize the spatio-temporal dynamics of networks in cognition and disease. For more information, see my recent publications (with reprints) and projects on Research Gate, my page on the MEG wiki (with publication list) and my CV.

 

TEAM MEMBERS

DYNAMAP PUBLICATIONS 

Selected Publications

  1. Jedynak, M., et al. (2023) “Variability of Single Pulse Electrical Stimulation Responses Recorded with Intracranial Electroencephalography in Epileptic PatientsBrain Topography

  2. López‐Madrona, Víctor J., et al. "Magnetoencephalography can reveal deep brain network activities linked to memory processes." Human Brain Mapping 43.15 (2022): 4733-4749.

  3. Simula, S., Daoud, M., Bénar, C. G., Benquet, P., Ruffini, G., Wendling, F., & Bartolomei, F. (2022). Transcranial current stimulation in epilepsy: A systematic review of the fundamental and clinical aspects. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 1289.

  4. Bénar, C. G., Velmurugan, J., López-Madrona, V. J., Pizzo, F., & Badier, J. M. (2021). Detection and localization of deep sources in magnetoencephalography: A review. Current Opinion in Biomedical Engineering, 18, 100285.

  5. Pizzo F, Roehri N, Medina Villalon S, Trébuchon A, Chen S, Lagarde S, Carron R, Gavaret M, Giusiano B, McGonigal A, Bartolomei F, Badier JM, Bénar CG. Deep brain activities can be detected with magnetoencephalography. Nat Commun. 2019 Feb 27;10(1):971. 

  6. Lagarde S, Roehri N, Lambert I, Trebuchon A, McGonigal A, Carron R, Scavarda D, Milh M, Pizzo F, Colombet B, Giusiano B, Medina Villalon S, Guye M, Bénar CG, Bartolomei F. Interictal stereotactic-EEG functional connectivity in refractory focal epilepsies. Brain. 2018 Oct 1;141(10):2966-2980. 

  7. Roehri N, Pizzo F, Lagarde S, Lambert I, Nica A, McGonigal A, Giusiano B, Bartolomei F, Bénar CG. High-frequency oscillations are not better biomarkers of epileptogenic tissues than spikes. Ann Neurol. 2018 Jan;83(1):84-97.

  8. Medina Villalon S, Paz R, Roehri N, Lagarde S, Pizzo F, Colombet B, Bartolomei F, Carron R, Bénar CG. EpiTools, A software suite for presurgical brain mapping in epilepsy: Intracerebral EEG. J Neurosci Methods. 2018 Jun 1;303:7-15.

  9. Bartolomei F, Lagarde S, Wendling F, McGonigal A, Jirsa V, Guye M, Bénar C. Defining epileptogenic networks: Contribution of SEEG and signal analysis. Epilepsia. 2017 Jul;58(7):1131-1147. doi: 10.1111/epi.13791. Epub 2017 May 20. Review.

Latest Publications

grey_background.png

DYNAMAP RESEARCH

Simultaneous recordings of MEG, EEG and SEEG

Most previous work on the comparison of MEG, EEG and intracerebral EEG was performed on separate recordings. However, this is far from being optimal. Indeed, only simultaneous recordings of surface and depth activity permit to investigate the exact same activity, independently of spontaneous fluctuations that can occur from a session to another (depending on subject state, medication etc). Moreover, simultaneous recordings allow using interevent fluctuations as a source of information on the link between signals, as was done on simultaneous EEG-fMRI.

We have shown for the first time the feasibility of trimodal simultaneous recordings: EEG, MEG and SEEG (Dubarry et al., 2014). Technical developments have been proposed in (Badier et al., 2017) and an application to presurgical mapping in (Gavaret et al., 2016). Recently, thanks to the simultaneous intracerebral recordings, we have shown that it is possible to capture the activity of deep structures on MEG (Pizzo et al 2019, López-Madrona et al. 2022).

Activity evoked by visual stimulation (checkerboard) on MEG, EEG and intracerebral EEG (SEEG) recorded simultaneously (Dubarry et al 2014).

Visibility of deep mesial source on an ICA component of MEG (Pizzo et al 2019).

Visibility of deep mesial source on an ICA component of MEG (Pizzo et al 2019).


Brain networks in epilepsy and sleep

An active line of research of the team, incollaborations between clinicians and researches, aims at characterizing brain networks from both intracerebral EEG and from surface (MEG, EEG) signals. The network view enables to better understand mechanisms of epilepsy and sleep; it also provides new venues for defining markers of the epileptogenic zone. Methods are available in the Anywave software, Epitools and other plugins (see below “Anywave” section).


Time frequency methods for high-frequency activity

High frequency oscillations (HFOs) have been proposed as a new marker for delineating epileptic tissues. One difficulty in characterizing these activity is that they are of much smaller amplitude than classical spike markers. We have proposed a new method to whiten the SEEG signals in order to better visualize and detect HFOs (Roehri et al., 2016). In a latter publication, we have shown that it may be useful to combine spike and HFO information instead of considering them separately (Roehri et al., 2018). The Delphos plugin is available here.

Effect of whitening on SEEG traces (see Roehri et al 2016).

Effect of whitening on SEEG traces (see Roehri et al 2016).

 

The AnyWave software and plugins

Within the DynaMap team, we have developed the AnyWave software for visualizing electrophysiological traces (main developer Bruno Colombet). This software is multiplatform and modular, and in particular, permits easy addition of plugins in Python or Matlab (Colombet et al., 2015). In addition, our software Gardel permits to register and segment SEEG electrodes (Medina Villalon et al., 2018). The AnyWave software is available for download here and the plugins there.

Example of ICA decomposition in Anywave (MEG traces). Software available on MEG wiki.

Example of ICA decomposition in Anywave (MEG traces). Software available on MEG wiki.